Research Article

Identification and Quantification of Coumarins in Four Ferulago Species (Apiaceae) Growing in Turkey by HPLC-DAD

Songül Karakaya1*, Hilal Özbek1, Zühal Güvenalp1, Hayri Duman2, Cavit Kazaz3 and Ceyda Sibel K?l?ç4

1Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Atatürk University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey

2Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Art and Sciences, Gazi University, Ankara 06500, Turkey

3Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Atatürk University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey

4Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara University, Ankara 06100, Turkey

*Corresponding author: Songül Karakaya, Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Atatürk University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey, Tel: +90 4422315318; E-mail: ecz-songul@hotmail.com

Citation: Karakaya S, Özbek H, Güvenalp Z, Duman H, Kazaz C, et al. (2017) Identification and Quantification of Coumarins in Four Ferulago Species (Apiaceae) Growing in Turkey by HPLC-DAD. J Pharm Sci Exp Pharmacol 2017: 35-42. doihttps://doi.org/10.29199/JAPS.101016

Received Date: 08 August, 2017; Accepted Date: 12 September, 2017; Published Date: 29 September, 2017

Abstract

Ferulago species have been used since ancient times for the treatment of intestinal worms, hemorrhoids and as tonic, digestive, aphrodisiac and sedative. They have also been used as salad or spice due to their special odors. Samples were analyzed on a ACE 5 CN S/N-A21532 column (250 x 4.6 mm, 10 μm) with hexane and ethyl acetate as mobile phases at a flow rate of 1.0 mL x min-1 and the method was successfully validated according to ICH guideline acceptance criteria for selectivity, linearity, precision, and accuracy. The structures of isolated compounds were elucidated by detailed analyses of 1D and 2D NMR and HR-ESI-MS data. Osthol (1), prantschimgin (2), felamidin (3) and umbelliferone (4) contents of roots and aerial parts from F. blancheana, F. pachyloba, F. trachycarpa and F. bracteata were found to be 0.39, 2.76, 1.26, 0.20, 0.10, 1.07, 0.26, 0.05; 0.14, 2.83, 0.56, 0.44, 0.23, 0.59, 0.26, 0.11; 0.11, 2.45, 1.29, 0.24, 0.27, 0.72, 0.43, 0.26 and 0.30, 2.28, 0.48, 0.21, 0.40, 0.83, 0.78, 0.05 %, respectively. A new Coumarin, peucedanol-2′-benzoate (5) was only found to be from roots of F. bracteata 1.12 %.

Keywords: Apiaceae; Coumarin; Ferulago; Peucedanol-2′-benzoate; Validation; HPLC

Introduction

Ferulago W Koch, belonging to Apiaceae family, is represented by approximately 50 taxa throughout the world and 34 taxa in Turkey 19 of which are endemic. Therefore, Anatolia is considered to be the gene center of this genus [1]. F. blancheana, F. pachyloba and F. bracteata are endemic perennial species, growing only in Kayseri, Nigde and Gaziantep, Turkey, respectively [2,3].

Ferulago species have been used in folk medicine for their aphrodisiac, digestive, tonic, sedative, antiseptic, carminative and vermifuge properties as well as for the treatment of hemorrhoids, ulcers, snake bites, spleen diseases and headache [4,5]. Except medicinal usage, they have been consumed as salad or spice due to their special odor, also as food for goats and deer’s [6].

Previous phytochemical studies indicated that Coumarins are the most common metabolites on Ferulago species [7]. Coumarins have various biological activities such as anticancer [8,9], antiinflammatory [10,11], anticoagulant [12,13], antiadipogenic [14], antitubercular [15], antihyperglycemic [16,17], antiviral [18], antifungal [19,20], antibacterial [21], antihypertensive [22,23], anticonvulsant [24], antioxidant [25,26], neuroprotective [27] and antidiabetic [28,29].

This study aims to give first report to identify and establish the content of several Coumarins like osthol, prantschimgin, felamidin, umbelliferone in F. blancheana, F. pachyloba, F. trachycarpa and F. bracteata by using HPLC-DAD. Also, a new Coumarin, peucedanol-2′-benzoate was isolated from roots of F. bracteata and established the content of in all species. Furthermore, the method was validated on the basis of selectivity, linearity, precision, and accuracy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the HPLC analysis and isolation of Coumarins from F. blancheana, F. pachyloba, F. trachycarpa and F. bracteata.

Material and Methods

Plant material

The aerial parts and roots of Ferulago blancheana, F. pachyloba, F. trachycarpa and F. bracteata were collected during flowering time in 2014 from Kayseri, Ni?de, Antalya and Gaziantep (Turkey), respectively and identified by Prof. Dr. Hayri Duman, a plant taxonomist in the Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Art and Sciences, Gazi University. The voucher specimens are kept in the Herbarium of Ankara University, Faculty of Pharmacy (Herbarium numbers are AEF 26673, AEF 26674, AEF 26677 and AEF 26676, respectively). Collected locations of these species are given in table 1.

Species

Collected Location

Voucher Numbers

F. blancheana

B6 Kayseri: Between P?narbas?-Sar?z, 4 Km to Sar?z, rocky slopes, 1633 m, 13.07.2014.

AEF 26673

F. pachyloba

C5 Nigde: Camard? Demirkaz?k village, Cimbar channel, rocky slopes, 1696 m, 13.07.2014.

AEF 26674

F. trachycarpa

C3 Antalya: Akseki-Seydisehir road 35. Km, calcareous slopes, 1785 m, 12.07.2014.

AEF 26677

F. bracteata

C6 Gaziantep: Nurdag? Antep road 22. Km, calcareous cliff slopes, 1642 m, 14.07.2014.

AEF 26676

Table 1: Collected locations of Ferulago species.

 

Reagents and chemicals

Hexane and ethyl acetate were HPLC-grade (Sigma, Germany). Analytical grade solvents of dichloromethane, ethyl acetate (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), n-butanol (Analar NORMAPUR, Fontenay, France), methanol (Sigma, France), sulphuric acid (Merck, Germany), and also silica gel (Merck-737, Germany) were used. Osthol, prantschimgin, felamidin and umbelliferone were isolated from the dichloromethane extracts of F. blancheana, F. pachyloba, F. trachycarpa and F. bracteata roots using silica gel columns. NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Mercury Plus at 400 MHz for 1H NMR and 100 MHz for 13C NMR by using TMS as the internal standard. The chemical shifts were measured in CDCl3. Mass spectra were recorded on a Waters Micromass ZQ Mass Spectrophotometer ESI and Agilent 6530 Accurate- Mass Q-TOF LC/MS. UV spectra were measured using Thermo Scientific Multiskan GO microplate and cuvette spectrophotometer. IR spectra were run on a Bruker VERTEX 70v FT-IR Spectrophotometer. TLC analyses were carried out on silica gel F254 TLC plates aluminum sheets (Merck). Compounds were detected by UV fluorescence and spraying 1% H2SO4 reagent, followed by heating at 105°C for 1-2 min.

Extraction, fractionation and isolation

Extracts were obtained from the aerial parts and roots of Ferulago blancheana, F. pachyloba, F. trachycarpa and F. bracteata with Methanol (MeOH). Aerial parts and roots were grounded and macerated (Heidolph MR3001, Germany) for 8 hours/3 days with methanol in a water bath not exceeding 45°C using a Heidolph mechanical mixer (300 rpm). The extracts, filtered and concentrated till dryness using a Heidolph rotary evaporator (Heidolph VV2000, Germany), were dispersed in methanol-water (1:9) and fractionated three times with 400 mL of dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, n-butanol and aqueous residue in a separatory funnel, respectively. Each fraction was then concentrated to dryness. Amounts of the powdered plants and obtained extracts are given in table 2.

Species

Used parts

Powdered

(g)

MeOH

(g)

CHCl (g)

EtOAc

(g)

n-BuOH

(g)

Aqueous residue (g)

F. blancheana

Root

750

86.62

28.52

2.32

12.24

23.35

Aerial part

50

3.22

1.89

0.46

0.57

0.39

F. pachyloba

Root

600

83.25

23.63

1.53

13.13

21.29

Aerial part

50

3.32

1.78

0.45

0.59

0.45

F. trachycarpa

Root

450

86.77

26.29

2.41

13.55

22.08

Aerial part

50

3.41

1.67

0.50

0.61

0.55

F. bracteata

Root

450

60.94

17.96

2.44

14.98

13.98

Aerial part

50

3.65

1.55

0.61

0.59

0.61

Table 2: Amounts of the powdered plants and obtained extracts.

 

As a result of the previous bioguided fractionation study [30], the effective dichloromethane extract was first submitted to a silica gel column (Merck 737, 70-230 Mesh) and eluted with a gradient of n-hexane:ethyl acetate (100:0 → 0:100, v/v) and ethyl acetate:methanol (100:0 → 0:100, v/v), and five fractions (Fr. A-E) were obtained. Repetitive silica gel column chromatography with n-hexane-ethyl acetate (90:10 and 95:5) solvent system on Fr. A gave compound 1 (220 mg). Eluting with n-hexane-ethyl acetate (80:20) over silica gel column of Fr. B gave compound 2 (420 mg). Fr. C was fractioned by column chromatography over silica gel using n-hexane:ethyl acetate mixtures (70:30 and 90:10) consecutively and compound 3 was obtained (330 mg). Fr. D was submitted on a silica gel column using n-hexane:ethyl acetate (65:35) and the resulting fraction was chromatographed on silica gel column using n-hexane:ethyl acetate (90:10) to give compound 4. Fr. E gave compound 5 (240 mg), eluting with n-hexane-ethyl acetate (80:20) over silica gel column. Compounds 1, 2, 3 and 4 were isolated by the same chromatographic methods in all species. Compounds 5 was only isolated from dichloromethane fraction from the roots of F. bracteata.

Peucedanol-2'-benzoate (5)

White powder; IR νmax (KBr) cm-1: 1702, 1623, 1565; UV λmax (CH2Cl2) nm (log ε): 350 (4.20); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) spectroscopic data, (Table 3); HR-ESI-MS at m/z 367.1999 [M-H]+ (Calcd for C21H19O6 367.1181).

No

δH (J in Hz)

δC

2

 

161.38

3

6.26 (d, 9.4)

112.37

4

7.64 (d, 9.4)

143.62

5

7.28 (s)

123.22

6

 

124.55

7

 

163.49

8

6.80 (s)

98.01

9

 

155.84

10

 

112.71

1′

3.38 (m)

29.67

2′

5.16 (dd, 9.2, 7.3)

89.12

3′

 

82.93

4′

1.72 (s)

22.16

5′

1.71 (s)

21.38

1′′

 

165.40

2′′

 

131.04

3′′

7.73 (m)

129.39

4′′

7.32 (m)

128.27

5′′

7.51 (m)

132.86

6′′

7.32 (m)

128.27

7′′

7.73 (m)

129.39

Table 3: 1H NMR (400 MHz) and 13C NMR (100 MHz) data of 5 in CDCl3.

 

Preparation of sample solutions and standard solutions

Quantitative determinations of osthol, prantschimgin, umbelliferone, felamidin and peucedanol-2'-benzoate obtained from the dichloromethane fractions of the roots of these species were performed as follows: 5 mg of the isolated compounds were weighed precisely, then dissolved in ethyl acetate and completed to 10 mL with in a volumetric flask. The retention times of reference compounds were determined individually. Then 5 μl of different dilutions were injected to the HPLC device 3 times and the calibration curve was established by plotting peak areas against the curve equation. The extract was transferred into a 10 mL volumetric flask which was made up to its volume with ethyl acetate and filtered through a 0.45 µm Econofilter (Agilent Technologies, USA) prior to injection into the HPLC system. Chromatograms obtained from dichloromethane extracts of plants were compared with standard chromatograms.

HPLC analysis

All analyses were performed on an Agilent Series 1100 (Agilent Technologies, USA) consisting of a LC/MSD Trap system, a quaternary pump, an autosampler, equipped with a vacuum degasser, a column compartment, a diode-array detector and an ion-trap mass spectrometer with electrospray ionization interface, controlled by Agilent LC/MSD Trap Software. A ACE 5 CN S/N-A21532 column (250x4.6 mm, 10 μm) was used. The reference compounds and samples were separated using an isocratic mobile phase consisting of n-hexane (76 %) and ethyl acetate (24 %). The flow rate was 1 mL/min and the injection volume was 10 µl. The column temperature was maintained at 28ºC. DAD data was collected from 190 to 400 nm. Identification of the main Coumarins was facilitated by HPLC-DAD. All standard working solutions were analyzed in foregoing HPLC conditions. The analyte peak area values were graphed against the corresponding concentrations of the analytes (expressed in mg/mL). In order to quantify the intermediate precision (interday precision) and repeatability (intraday precision) the same stock solutions with four different osthol, prantschimgin, felamidin, umbelliferone and peucedanol-2'-benzoate concentrations were injected into the HPLC system 3 times on the same day and 3 times over different days. The percentage Relative Standard Deviations (RSD, %) of the data in this way obtained were calculated. Accuracy was evaluated by means of recovery assays performed by adding known amounts of the reference compounds to the sample solutions.

Quantification of the main coumarins in roots and aerial parts of F. blancheana, F. pachyloba, F. trachycarpa and F. bracteata

For the quantification of main Coumarins found in the roots and aerial parts of Ferulago blancheana, F. pachyloba, F. trachycarpa and F. bracteata HPLC-DAD method has been validated using the external standard osthol, prantschimgin, felamidin, umbelliferone and peucedanol-2'-benzoate.

Statistical analysis

All results are expressed as mean ± SE and differences between means were statistically analyzed using One-way analysis of ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s complementary analysis, with P<0.05 considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results and Discussion

Methanol extract of the roots of these species were fractionated using solvents with different polarities (n-hexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate and n-butanol). The active dichloromethane extract was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel. As the result, a new Coumarin, peucedanol-2′-benzoate (5), together with four known ones, osthol (1) [31], prantschimgin (2) [32], felamidin (3) [33] and umbelliferone (4) [34] (Figure 1) were isolated and identified.

Chemical structures of compounds 1-5Figure 1: Chemical structures of compounds 1-5.

 

Peucedanol-2′-benzoate (5) was isolated as a white powder with the molecular formula of C21H20O6 as determined by the HR-ESI-MS at m/z 367.1999 [M-H]+ (Calcd for C21H19O6 367.1181). The IR spectrum of 5 showed absorption bands for C=O groups (1702 cm-1) and -CH=CH- bonds (1623, 1565 cm-1). The 1H NMR spectrum of compound 5 displayed two AB type system protons at δH 6.26 and 7.64 (each 1H, d, J = 9.4 Hz) which was attributed to the H-3 and H-4 protons of the Coumarin nucleus. The two single aromatic proton signals at δH 7.28 and 6.80 were assigned to H-5 and H-8 protons. The 13C NMR spectrum revealed the presence of 9 carbons resonances including four methine [δC 112.37 (C-3), 143.62 (C-4), 123.22 (C-5), 98.01 (C-8)], three oxygenated quaternary [δC 161.38 (C-2), 163.49 (C-7), 155.84 (C-9)] and two non-oxygenated quaternary carbons [δC 124.55 (C-6), 112.71 (C-10)] for Coumarin skeleton. Two tertiary methyls at δH 1.72 (3H, s, H-4′), 1.71 (3H, s, H-5′) and at δC 22.16 (C-4′), 21.38 (C-5′) with the hydroxyl group; an oxygenated methine at δH 5.16 (1H, dd, J = 9.2/7.3 Hz, H-2′) and at δC 89.12 (C-2′); and a methylene at δH 3.38 (2H, m, H-1′) and at δC 29.67 (C-1′) confirmed the 2′,3′-dihydroxy-3′-methyl butyl moiety. HMBC correlation (Figure 2) between H-1′ (δH 3.38) and C-6 (δC 124.55) suggested that it was attached to C-6 position. Characteristic signals of a benzoyl moiety were also exhibited, including a pair of 2H at δH 7.73 (H-3′′, H-7′′) and 7.32 (H-4′′, H-6′′) and 1H at 7.51 (H-5′′) in the 1H NMR spectrum and aromatic carbons at δC 131.04 (C-2′′), 129.39 (C-3′′, C-7′′), 128.27 (C-4′′, C-6′′), 132.86 (C-5′′) with a carbonyl carbon at δC 165.40 (C-1′′) in the 13C NMR spectrum. The linkage of the benzoyl group to the 2′,3′-dihydroxy-3′-methyl butyl moiety was deduced from the downfield shifted signal of H-2′ (δH 5.16) and C-2′ (δC 89.12). Thus, the structure of the compound 5 was characterized as peucedanol-2′-benzoate.

correlations of compound 5

Figure 2: Significant HMBC (→) correlations of compound 5.

 

Validation of the method

Validation of the method was carried out for 3 days by testing the following criteria: linearity, response function, trueness, accuracy, precision (repeatability and intermediate precision), Limits of Detection (LOD) and Limits of Quantification (LOQ), and quantification range. Analyte standard solutions at four different concentrations were injected into the HPLC system. The procedure was evaluated in triplicate for each concentration. The analyte concentrations were as follows: 100, 200, 300, and 400 mg/mL for osthol, prantschimgin, felamidin, umbelliferone and peucedanol-2′-benzoate. The calibrations were curves constructed via the least-squares method. The methods were validated in accordance with the ICH guidelines on the validation of analytical methods [35,36].

HPLC method development

Obtained chromatograms with baseline separation of the five marker compounds in plants, selection of the column, mobile phase composition, conditions for isocratic flow and temperature was performed by HPLC. Initially a number of solvent systems were tried to develop a separation method for the isolates from the plants extract solutions starting from pure n-hexane and ethyl acetate. Finally, a simple isocratic method comprising of A (n-hexane-76%) and B (ethyl acetate-24%) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min provided a best base line separation with elution of all marker compounds in less than 20 minutes. Maximally efficient detection was observed at a fixed wavelength of 320 nm. Compounds 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were found to elute at 4.86, 5.89, 6.58, 7.86 and 4.98 min respectively with highly symmetric and well resolved peaks.

Identification of the constituents

Identification of all constituents was performed by HPLC-DAD analysis by comparing the retention time and the UV spectra of the peaks in the samples with those of authentic reference samples or isolated compounds and in some cases data reported in the literature. The developed method indicated a fair amount of specificity. Comparison between the peaks of the spectra and the retention times confirmed the specificity of the developed analytical methods.

Linearity

Linearity of the developed method was validated by analysing four concentrations of each analyte ranging between 1 and 10.2 mg/mL. A 10.0 mL volume of standard solution was injected and analysed using the following HPLC method. The analysis were carried out in triplicate for all samples. Calibration curves for all compounds were obtained using linear regression analysis. The concentration range is usually selected as per ICH guidelines (International Conference on Harmonization i.e., 70% and 130% of the nominal concentration). All the results are indicated in table 4.

Compounds

1

2

3

4

5

Retention Time

4.86

5.89

6.58

7.86

4.98

Linearity range (µg.mL-1)

1-10.2

1-10.2

1-10.21

1-10.2

1-10.2

Slope

251.2

227.5

207.3

508.9

265.4

Intercept

534.4

430.0

389.9

502.3

567.3

Correlation coefficient

0.997

0.997

0.997

0.998

0.997

Standard error of the slope

0.0641

0.0312

0.0152

0.0451

0.0491

Standard error of the intercept

0.2516

0.3055

0.1527

0.4509

0.5671

Limit of detection

0.1311

0.2637

0.3431

0.1469

0.1873

Limit of quantification

0.4370

0.8790

1.1449

0.4897

0.5642

Repeatability (RSD %)

0.287

0.167

0.461

0.111

0.278

Reproducibility (RSD %)

0.441

0.219

0.345

0.256

0.345

Table 4: Calibration values for compounds 1-5.

 

Specificity

In order to validate the specificity of the developed method, standard solutions of the analytes were prepared. An isocratic system of n-hexane and ethyl acetate was used as a blank control and fixed injection volumes of each sample, standard and blank solutions were applied and analysed using the developed HPLC method.

Accuracy

The accuracy of the developed HPLC method was carried out by spiking the known amounts of analytes into extract solution of Ferulago blancheana, F. pachyloba, F. trachycarpa and F. bracteata. After addition of known amounts of each analyte to the previous analysis extracts solutions recovery studies were carried out and the results were shown in table 5. The recovery rates of the analytes ranged between 92.3 and 99.8% with relative standard deviations in the range of 0.091-0.987% i.e., less than 5% indicating high accuracy of the developed method.

Marker compounds

Amount present in the extract (mg)

Amount added (mg)

Amount found (mg)

Recovery (%) ±SS

RSD (%)

1

0.158

0.1

0.099

99.02±0.987

0.00996

0.2

0.210

105.04±0.903

0.00860

0.4

0.398

99.51±0.789

0.00790

2

0.5

0.25

0.231

92.43±0.580

0.00620

0.5

0.494

98.96±0.720

0.00730

1

0.923

92.34±0.091

0.00098

3

1.11

0.5

0.486

97.25±0.098

0.00100

1

0.998

99.88±0.810

0.00810

2

1.945

97.39±0.840

0.00860

4

0.079

0.04

0.039

99.08±0.023

0.00023

0.08

0.079

99.85±0.650

0.00650

0.16

0.154

97.58±0.510

0.01200

5

0.43

0.3

0.297

96.78±0.670

0.03450

0.6

0.591

97.92±0.910

0.06540

1.2

1.19

95.45±0.072

0.03478

Table 5: Recoveries for the assay of marker compounds in the species.

 

Precision

Based on the triplicate analysis performed each day and also per day over a three-day period, the intra as well as inter day precision levels for the developed method was analysed. The results are shown in table 6. The intraday variations were carried out by analyzing triplicate at four different concentrations (1, 4.2, 6.8 and 10.2) in a day. The interday variations were identified by analyzing triplicate at four different concentrations at three days and the results are expressed as RSD (%) = (SD/mean) x 100%. The RSD was well below 5 % showing good precision of the developed method. To analyze the repeatability of the method, the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) values of retention times was determined and found to be <0.007801 %.

Intraday

Interday

Marker compound

Concentration (mg/mL)

Found (mg/mL)

(Mean±SD)

Accuracy (%)

Precision (RSD) (%)

Found (mg/mL) (Mean±SD)

Accuracy (%)

Precision (RSD) (%)

1

1

1.0311±0.0069

103.11

0.0087

1.13±0.06

103.0

0.0264

4.2

4.4258±0.1660

105.37

0.0007

4.53±0.21

102.9

0.0042

6.8

6.9503±0.0080

102.21

0.0002

7.24±0.34

97.5

0.0022

10.1

10.309±0.0180

102.07

0.0009

11.03±0.1

101.2

0.0015

2

1

1.0855±0.0270

101.19

0.0015

1.15±0.3

98.2

0.0007

4.2

4.1746±0.0070

99.396

0.0001

4.34±0.67

103.3

0.0039

6.8

6.9534±0.2620

102.25

0.0018

6.96±0.45

102.3

0.0014

10.2

10.564±0.1530

102.59

0.0013

10.52±0.8

103.1

0.0005

3

1

1.0787±0.0060

101.45

0.0041

1.18±0.4

101.3

0.0034

4.2

4.1331±0.0140

98.206

0.0072

4.23±0.08

100.7

0.0028

6.8

6.7930±0.0220

99.705

0.0021

7.00±0.05

102.9

0.0029

10.1

10.309±0.0090

102.15

0.0011

10.60±0.8

99.0

0.0032

4

1.1

1.135±0.0060

103.17

0.0078

1.16±0.3

101.61

0.0093

4

4.0332±0.0160

100.83

0.0044

3.77±0.34

94.41

0.1509

6.8

6.7539±0.0950

99.322

0.0012

6.77±0.67

99.5

0.0010

10.2

10.415±0.0110

101.21

0.0027

10.60±0.31

103.9

0.0007

1

1.037±0.0170

101.34

0.0091

1.56±0.65

101.61

0.0093

4

4.029±0.0220

99.93

0.0051

4.72±0.51

98.23

0.2398

6.8

6.7599±0.0390

100.22

0.0072

6.56±0.45

98.41

0.0176

10.2

10.551±0.0290

101.41

0.0092

10.76±0.17

102.01

0.0573

Table 6: Intra and inter-day accuracies and precisions area of HPLC method of marker compounds 1-5.

 

Percentage of osthol, prantschimgin, felamidin, umbelliferone and peucedanol-2′-benzoate in the dichloromethane extracts of the species roots and aerial parts. The amounts of isolated constituents present in dichloromethane extracts F. blancheana, F. pachyloba, F. trachycarpa and F. bracteata roots and aerial parts are shown in table 7. Prantschimgin is the major Coumarin component of the roots and aerial parts of all species.

Species

1

2

3

4

5

F. blancheana

Root

0.39

2.76

1.26

0.20

-

Aerial part

0.10

1.07

0.26

0.05

-

F. pachyloba

Root

0.14

2.83

0.56

0.44

-

Aerial part

0.23

0.59

0.26

0.11

-

F. trachycarpa

Root

0.11

2.45

1.29

0.24

-

Aerial part

0.27

0.72

0.43

0.26

-

F. bracteata

Root

0.30

2.28

0.48

0.21

1.12

Aerial part

0.40

0.83

0.78

0.05

-

Table 7: Content of compounds 1-5 (w/w %) in dichloromethane extracts of roots and aerial part of the species determined by HPLC.

 

Coumarins represent interesting compounds in the Apiaceae family. Recent studies have shown their broad spectrum of biological activities and their potential as new drug leads [37]. Although several HPLC methods for the analysis of Coumarins were developed and published, as far as we are concerned, this is the first study on the Coumarin content of F. blancheana, F. pachyloba, F. trachycarpa and F. bracteata. The potential of Coumarins has not been fully exploited despite their biological importance; thus, discovery of new drug substances and molecules can be a model for synthetic drugs. So, it was studied on the development of standard HPLC methods (resolution and quantification) of the natural products isolated from F. blancheana, F. pachyloba, F. trachycarpa and F. bracteata.

Overall, the Coumarin content of the dichloromethane extracts is potentially high enough to exert biological effects. The developed method was suitable for the identification and quantification of the compounds in these plants. A highest percentage was found 2.76%, of prantschimgin in roots of F. blancheana and the lowest was found in aerial parts of F. pachyloba with 0.59%.

In conclusion, the above-described method is well suited for fast profiling and quantification of the main Coumarins like osthol, prantschimgin, felamidin, umbelliferone and peucedanol-2′-benzoate for quality control of the drugs and various preparations for this reason. As far as we know, this is the first report on the HPLC analysis and isolation of Coumarins from F. blancheana, F. pachyloba, F. trachycarpa and F. bracteata.

Acknowledgments

The authors report no conflict of interest in this study. Analytical experiments and processes were carried out at the Laboratoryof the Faculty of Pharmacy of Ankara University so the authors would like to thank Ankara University for their support during the completion of this study. This study was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK 115S009).

 

References

  1. Güner A, Aslan S, Ekim T, Vural M, Babaç MT (2012) Ferulago. In: Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarl? Bitkiler). Güner A, (eds.). Nezahat Gökyi?it Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Ara?t?rmalar? Derne?i Yay?n?. (1stedn.), ?stanbul, Turkey. Pg no: 62-64.
  2. Pe?men H (1972) Ferulago W Koch. In: Davis PH, (ed.). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. 2ndedn, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK. Volume 4, Pg no: 469-471.
  3. Troia A, Raimondo FM, Castellano G, Spadaro V (2012) Morphological, karyological and taxonomic remarks on Ferulago nodosa (L.) Boiss. (Apiaceae). Plant Biosystems 146: 330-337.
  4. Boulus L (1983) Medicinal Plants of North-Africa. Reference Publications, Incorporated. Algonac, Michigan, USA.
  5. Demetzos C, Perdetzoglou D, Gazouli M, Tan K, Economakis C (2000) Chemical analysis and antimicrobial studies on three species of Ferulago from Greece. Planta Med 66: 560-563.
  6. Erdurak CS (2003) Investigations on Ferulago isaurica Pe?men and F. syriaca Boiss. (Umbelliferae) species. Ph.D. Thesis, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
  7. Jiménez B, Grande MC, Anaya J, Torres P, Grande M (2000) Coumarins from Ferulago capillaris and F. brachyloba. Phytochemistry 53: 1025-1031.
  8. Lee CR, Shin EJ, Kim HC, Choi YS, Shin T, et al. (2011) Esculetin inhibits N-methyl-D-aspartate neurotoxicity via glutathione preservation in primary cortical cultures. Lab Anim Res 27: 259-263.
  9. Luo KW, Sun JG, Chan JY, Yang L, Wu SH, et al. (2011) Anticancer effects of imperatorin isolated from Angelica dahurica: induction of apoptosis in HepG2 cells through both death-receptor and mitochondria-mediated pathways. Chemotherapy 57: 449-459.
  10. Huang GJ, Deng JS, Liao JC, Hou WC, Wang SY, et al. (2012) Inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 participate in anti-inflammatory activity of imperatorin from Glehnia littoralis. J Agric Food Chem 60: 1673-1681.
  11. Kwon OS, Choi JS, Islam MN, Kim YS, Kim HP (2011) Inhibition of 5-lipoxygenase and skin inflammation by the aerial parts of Artemisia capillaris and its constituents. Arch Pharm Res 34: 1561-1569.
  12. Aoyama Y, Katayama T, Yamamoto M, Tanaka H, Kon K (1992) A new antitumor antibiotic product, demethylchartreusin. Isolation and biological activities. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 45: 875-878.
  13. Hirsh J, Dalen JE, Anderson DR, Poller L, Bussey H, et al. (2001) Oral anticoagulants: mechanism of action, clinical effectiveness, and optimal therapeutic range. Chest 119: 8-21.
  14. Shin E, Choi KM, Yoo HS, Lee CK, Hwang BY, et al. (2010) Inhibitory effects of coumarins from the stem barks of Fraxinus rhynchophylla on adipocyte differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells. Biol Pharm Bull 33: 1610-1614.
  15. Chiang CC, Cheng MJ, Huang HY, Chang HS, Wang CJ, et al. (2010) Prenyl coumarins from Fatoua pilosa. J Nat Prod 73: 1718-1722.
  16. Fort DM, Rao K, Jolad SD, Luo J, Carlson TJ, et al. (2000) Antihyperglycemic activity of Teramnus labialis (Fabaceae). Phytomedicine 6: 465-467.
  17. Tchamadeu MC, Dzeufiet PD, Nouga CC, Azebaze AG, Allard J, et al. (2010) Hypoglycaemic effects of Mammea africana (Guttiferae) in diabetic rats. J Ethnopharmacol 127: 368-372.
  18. Venugopala KN, Rashmi V, Odhav B (2013) Review on natural coumarin lead compounds for their pharmacological activity. BioMed Research International 2013: 1-14.
  19. Chou SY, Hsu CS, Wang KT, Wang MC, Wang CC (2007) Antitumor effects of osthol from Cnidium monnieri: an in vitro and in vivo study. Phytother Res 21: 226-230.
  20. Wang CM, Zhou W, Li CX, Chen H, Shi ZQ, et al. (2009) Efficacy of osthol, a potent coumarin compound, in controlling powdery mildew caused by Sphaerotheca fuliginea. J Asian Nat Prod Res 11: 783-791.
  21. Rosselli S, Maggio AM, Faraone N, Spadaro V, Morris-Natschke SL, et al. (2009) The cytotoxic properties of natural coumarins isolated from roots of Ferulago campestris (Apiaceae) and of synthetic ester derivatives of aegelinol. Nat Prod Commun 4: 1701-1706.
  22. Crichton EG, Waterman PG (1978) Dihydromammea C/OB: a new coumarin from the seed of Mammea africana. Phytochemistry 17: 1783-1786.
  23. Gantimur D, Syrchina AI, Semenov AA (1986) Khellactone derivatives from Phlojodicarpus sibiricus. Chem Nat Compd 22: 103-104.
  24. Luszczki JJ, Wojda E, Andres-Mach M, Cisowski W, Glensk M, et al. (2009) Anticonvulsant and acute neurotoxic effects of imperatorin, osthole and valproate in the maximal electroshock seizure and chimney tests in mice: a comparative study. Epilepsy Res 85: 293-299.
  25. Basile A, Sorbo S, Spadaro V, Bruno M, Maggio A, et al. (2009) Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of coumarins from the roots of Ferulago campestris (Apiaceae). Molecules 14: 939-952.
  26. Kim SH, Kang KA, Zhang R, Piao MJ, Ko DO, et al. (2008) Protective effect of esculetin against oxidative stress-induced cell damage via scavenging reactive oxygen species. Acta Pharmacol Sin 29: 1319-1326.
  27. Wang C, Pei A, Chen J, Yu H, Sun ML, et al. (2012) A natural coumarin derivative esculetin offers neuroprotection on cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice. J Neurochem 121: 1007-1013.
  28. Marles RJ, Farnsworth NR (1995) Antidiabetic plants and their active constituents. Phytomedicine 2: 137-189.
  29. Patel DK, Prasad SK, Kumar R, Hemalatha S (2012) An overview on antidiabetic medicinal plants having insulin mimetic property. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2: 320-330.
  30. Karakaya S (2016) Investigations on Ferulago trachycarpa Boiss., F. blancheana Post., F. pachyloba (Fenzl) Boiss. and F. bracteata Boiss. & Haussk. (Apiaceae). PhD Thesis, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
  31. Sajjadi S, Zeinvand H, Shokoohinia Y (2009) Isolation and identification of osthol from the fruits and essential oil composition of the leaves of Prangos asperula Boiss. Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences 4: 19-23.
  32. Sajjadi S, Jamali M, Shokoohinia Y, Abdi G, Shahbazi B, et al. (2015) Antiproliferative evaluation of terpenoids and terpenoid coumarins from Ferulago macrocarpa (Fenzl) Boiss. fruits. Pharmacognosy Res 7: 322-328.
  33. Kilic CS, Okada Y, Coskun M, Okuyama T (2006) New furanocoumarins isolated from the roots of Ferulago isaurica Pesmen growing in Turkey. Heterocycles 69: 481-486.
  34. Singh R, Singh B, Singh S, Kumar N, Kumar S, et al. (2010) Umbelliferone – An antioxidant isolated from Acacia nilotica (L.) Willd. Ex Del. Food Chem 120: 825-830.
  35. ICH Guideline Q2A (R1) (1994) Validation of Analytical Procedures. Text and Methodology, Proceedings of the International Conference on Harmonization, Geneva, Switzerland. Pg no: 1-5.
  36. ICH Guideline Q2B (1996) Validation of Analytical Procedures. Text and Methodology, Proceedings of the International Conference on Harmonization, Geneva, Switzerland. Pg no: 1-8.
  37. Vogl S, Zehl M, Picker P, Urban E, Wawrosch C, et al. (2011) Identification and quantification of coumarins in Peucedanum ostruthium (L.) Koch by HPLC-DAD and HPLC-DAD-MS. J Agric Food Chem 59: 4371-4377.