Research Article

Lung Shunt Estimate in Yttrium-90 Microsphere Therapy

Jianqiao Luo*

Department of Radiology, Virginia Commonwealth University Healthcare Systems, Richmond, Virginia, USA

*Corresponding author: Jianqiao Luo, Department of Radiology, Virginia Commonwealth University Healthcare Systems, P.O. Box 980001, Gateway 236, 1200 East Marshall Street, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0001, USA, Tel: +1 8048281443; Fax: +1 8048284181; E-mail: jianqiao.luo@vcuhealth.org

Citation: Luo J (2017) Lung Shunt Estimate in Yttrium-90 Microsphere Therapy. J Interv Radiol Nucl Med 2017: 1-3. doi: https://doi.org/10.29199/2637-7152/IRNM-101012

Received: 09 June, 2017; Accepted: 18 August, 2017; Published: 02 September, 2017

Abstract

This study was to evaluate lung shunting from Tc-99m MAA (Macroaggregated Albumin) and Y-90 imaging, and its effect on treatment planning. Y-90 Microspheres (Therasphere, BTG) were selected for this study. Y-90 Sirsphere (SirTex) is similar in term of lung shunt estimate. Tc-99m MAA imaging is utilized to assess pulmonary shunting which will affect treatment dose. Uncertainty or inaccuracy of the shunting calculation using Region of Interest (RoI) definition may be significant caused by drawing the RoIs on clinical images. Standard shunting compares the ratios of activity in the liver and lungs.

Introduction

Yttrium-90 MicroSpheres have been used for the treatment of unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) [1]. Tc99m MAA imaging is performed to assess extra hepatic flow to the pulmonary shunting, which is a key factor in treatment planning. The maximum allowed dose to the lungs for a single treatment is 30 Gy [2,3]. The Tc99m MAA was to simulate Y-90 microspheres in order to evaluate distribution and shunting before the actual therapy to avoid lung injury from Y-90 radiation. There are two types of Y-90 microspheres: Therasphere (BTG) and Sirspheres (Sirtex) used for liver cancer. Y-90 Microspheres (Therasphere, BTG) were selected for this study. Tc-99m MAA imaging is utilized to assess pulmonary shunting which will affect treatment dose. Standard shunting compares the ratios of activity in the liver and lungs.

Treatment planning of Y-90 Therasphere is based on liver volume and shunting ratio. The recommended dose to the liver is between 80 Gy to 150 Gy [2,4]. The liver volume and mass is determined from CT scan, or could be from SPECT imaging as well. Since the Therasphere dose is normally shipped in a few preset quantities: 3, 5, 7 GBq etc., actual dose depends on patient scheduling to account for radioactive decay. Unlike in Sirsphere treatment procedure, there is no dose preparation (or dose draw) on the user side. However, measurement of the Therasphere dose with dose calibrator and Ion chamber should be performed carefully because of the nature of Y-90 emission of beta particle.

Methods

Twenty-five HCC patients were randomly selected to evaluate shunting ratios with Tc-99m MAA infusion, prior to their Y-90 Therasphere treatments. Eight studies required the redrawing of RoIs (Region of Interest) to correct the variance in geometric mean. Actual activity was determined following treatment planning guidelines based on standard and measured shunting. Y-90 imaging of patients was also investigated for radionuclide distribution.

Microspheres Pre-treatment Imaging [4,5].

Radiopharmaceutical          :   Tc-99m Macroaggregated Albumin (MAA)

Dose                                 :   4 mCi (total volume - QS to 2 ml)

Route of Administration      :   Hepatic Catheter infusion

Instrumentation                 :   Dual-head LFOV SPECT camera with Low energy high-resolution

                                             collimators.

Acquisition Protocol            :   Acquire a Planar/SPECT study of the liver using the MAA injection.

Planar imaging of anterior and posterior views of the chest (for both lungs) and abdomen (for the liver and gastroduodenal region) were acquired with the patient in a supine position. SPECT imaging can be used to estimate the lung shunt ratio with high accuracy and specificity but longer imaging time and more work on tomographic volume definition.

Image processing and analysis were performed on a Siemens workstation to calculate the percentage of lung shunt. Regions of interest were drawn manually around lungs and liver on the planar images (Figure 1). For each study, ROIs were drawn on the images of the lung-fields in the anterior and posterior views (excluding the heart) (Figure 2 and 3). Likewise, ROIs were drawn around the liver on both anterior and posterior views. The geometric mean of the net anterior and posterior count rates was calculated for both of lungs and liver. The lung shunt was calculated as the ratio of lungcounts to total-counts; the ratio of the lung counts and the summed counts in the lungs, liver and tumor [5].

 

                                                                                                                                      

Figure 1: Manually draw regions of Tc-99m MAA infusion and distribution from anterior and posterior images.

 

                                                                                                                                      

Figure 2: Definition of lungs from the anterior and posterior images depends on visual inspection of the distribution of the Tc-99m MAA. Image on the left showed that RoI was too far away from the perimeter of the lungs (red), and the RoI cut into other organ (green). Image on the right showed corrected RoIs.

 

                                                                                                                                      

Figure 3: Background activity was estimated from regional counts from a “cold” area where there is no peripheral organ. Image on the left showed that the background RoI was too close to other organ. Image on the right showed corrected RoI for the background.

 

Inadequate RoIs were identified in 8 patients (Table 1), which yielded up to 5% (mean 0.79%, STD 1.76%) difference (p=0.90) in lung shunting. The treatment dose showed 5.29% (mean 0.74%, STD 2.21%) deviation (p=0.91) caused by the ratios. It was further compared with standard ratios of 4% for none-HCC and 7% for HCC.

                            Lung Shunting from Re-draw RoIs

Patient #

Lung Shunt

Treat. Activity

 

Geom

Geom

Original

Re-draw

1

37.72%

37.72%

1.48

1.46

2

12.09%

7.79%

2.08

2.19

3

3.01%

4.07%

2.3

2.27

4

3.97%

4.54%

2.28

2.26

5

3.30%

1.55%

2.29

2.33

6

2.68%

1.52%

2.31

2.33

7

16.62%

15.23%

1.98

2.01

8

5.25%

5.25%

2.25

2.25

Table 1: Significant difference found from lung shunt calculated using manually drawn RoIs.

    

Difference in the treatment doses from corrected ratios and the standard was: mean 9.01%, STD 19.7%, p=0.19 for the 4% and mean 5.18%, STD 19.0%, p=0.55 for the 7%. Y-90 patients’ images did not provide activity distribution in lungs when there was high shunting based on Tc99m MAA imaging, but demonstrated Y-90 activity in liver.

Tc99m MAA imaging is important in treatment planning to avoid error from lung shunting. RoIs should be accurate and consistent to reduce error in treatment dose.

Y-90 imaging depends on scatter characteristic of tissue and does not yield appropriate shunting images with Yttrium-90.

Results:

  • Inadequate ROIs were identified in eight patient images, which yielded up to 5% difference in lung shunting ratios.
  • Avg. 0.79%
  • STD 1.76%
  • t Test: p = 0.90
  • The treatment dose showed 5.29% deviation caused by the ratios.
      • Avg. 0.74%
      • STD 2.21%
  • t Test: p = 0.91
  • Results were further compared with standard ratios of 4% for non-HCC and 7% for HCC.
    • Difference in the treatment doses from corrected ratios and from the standard ratio were:
      • Avg. 9.01%, STD 19.7%, t Test: p = 0.19 for the 4%
      • Avg. 5.18%, STD 19.0%, t Test: p = 0.55 for the 7%
  • Nuclear medicine imaging using Tc99m MAA is an important part of treatment planning.
  • Significant error occurs if the standard lung shunting is used in dose calculation.
  • In Tc99m MAA image analysis, ROI analysis should be accurate and consistent in order to reduce possible error in treatment dose.

There are uncertainties in defining RoIs due to limited special resolution of the gamma camera and human error in drawing the regions. Tomographic imaging will improve the lung shunt calculation, and SPECT CT technology should be used to obtain volume of interest counts to evaluate activity ratios.

References

             

  1. Salem R, Lewandowski RJ, Atassi B, Gordon SC, Gates VL, et al. (2005) Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Use of 90Y Microspheres (TheraSphere): Safety, Tumor Response, and Survival. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12: 1627-1639.          
  2. https://www.btg-im.com/getattachment/TheraSphere/Products/Indications/TheraSphere-Package-Insert_USA_Rev-14.pdf.aspx            
  3. Goin JE, Salem R, Carr BI, Dancey JE,Soulen MC, et al. (2005) Treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with intrahepatic 90Y-micro-spheres: factors associated with liver toxicities. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16: 205-213.            
  4. Klingensmith W, Eshima D, Goddard J (2006) Nuclear Medicine Procedure Manual 2006-08. Wick Publishing, Englewood, CO, USA.             
  5. Refaat R, Hassan MS (2014) The relationship between the percentage of lung shunting on Tc-99m macroaggregated albumin (Tc-99m MAA) scan and the grade of hepatocellular carcinoma vascularity. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 45: 333-342.