Research Article

Odour and Salt Taste Identification in Older Adults: Evidence from The Yakumo Study in August, 2015 - 2017

Naomi Katayama1,2,3*, Shoko Kondo4, Yui Nakayama2, Takafumi Nakada5, Seiya Goto3, Satofumi Sugimoto3, Wakako kinoshita3, Masaaki Teranisi3, Michihiko Sone3, Yasushi Fujimoto3, Hironao Otake6, Hirokazu Suzuki5, Seiichi Nakata7 and Tsutomu Nakashima8

1Nagoya Women’s University, Nagoya City, Japan

2Graduate School of Nagoya Women’s University, Nagoya City, Japan

3Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan

4Watanabe Hospital, Mihama town, Noma, Aichi, Japan

5National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan

6Otake Otolaryngology Hospital, Kariya City, Aichi, Japan

7Department of Otolaryngology, Second Hospital Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan

8Ichinomiya Medical Treatment & Habitaiton Center, Ichinomiya, Japan

*Corresponding author: Naomi Katayama, Nagoya Women’s University, Nagoya City, Japan, E-mail: naomik@nagoya-wu.ac.jp

Citation: Katayama N, Kondo S, Nakayama Y, Nakada T, Goto S, et al. (2018) Odour and Salt Taste Identification in Older Adults: Evidence from the Yakumo Study in August, 2015-2017. Recent Adv Food Sci Nutr Res 2018: 56-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.29199/2638-9770/FSNR-102019

Received Date: 03 September, 2018; Accepted Date: 24 October, 2018; Published Date: 29 October, 2018

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between olfactory function and taste function as same as last report. A personal function test was calculated from the Yakumo study database, and the odour stick identification test and salt taste identification test were administered to healthy elderly people. The participants were community dwellers who voluntarily participated in the Yakumo Study and had managed everyday life by themselves. We united data for three years (2015-2017) and checked a taste test result and the olfactometry result. We compared the answer of female participants with that of male participants and found that recognition of odour identification test was better in female participants than male participants. Regarding the salt taste, it was revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between males and females. It was also found that there was no statistically significant difference between age with regard to taste. As for olfaction, it became clear that there is statistically significant difference between males and females. Female had statistically significant olfactory test results better than males. Statistically significant olfactory test results were particularly good in the sixties and seventies. It was also clear that there was statistically significant difference between age with respect to olfaction. The olfaction was diminished with age. Result of 12 kinds of odour recognition, male and female have the same result of top three incenses and bottom four incenses. The most comprehensible smell was the following order. That incense is Curry, Sweat socks, and Fried garlic. The most incomprehensible smell was the following order. That incense is Cypress, Mandarin orange, Menthol, and Wood. We regard the test-result of the saltiness as normalcy if participant can recognize saltness in less than 0.1%. And we regard the test-result of odour as normalcy if participant can recognize the smell of Curry, Sweat socks, and Fried garlic.

Keywords: Healthy Elderly People; Olfactory Function; Taste Function; Yakumo Study

Introduction

Japan is an ageing society. The proportion of elderly population in Japan will become the highest among the total population in the next ten years. There is a concern that with increasing age, individuals would soon be unable to identify through the sense of smell. Furthermore, nasal congestion and olfactory disorders occurring after inflammation that are caused by allergic rhinitis, modern-day hay fever, and common colds also inhibit the sense of smell [1,2,3] Present in a narrow region of the mucosa that covers the inside of the nose (olfactory epithelium) are the olfactory receptor neurons. The dendritic ends (olfactory cilia) of these neurons detect odour molecules that enter the nose via currents of air, which produces an electrical signal. This signal travels up through the bone that forms the ceiling of the nasal cavity (the cribriform plate) via nerve fibres that converge on the olfactory bulb, an enlarged area of nerve cells of the brain that also form olfactory nerves. Signals passing through the olfactory bulb travel to the brain along these olfactory nerves, where the signals are interpreted, and the smell is recognized [4]. The medial aspect of the temporal lobe that remembers smells is also stimulated at this point, and the brain can identify the odour based on a memory of previously experienced smells. In other words, smell identification requires an already-accumulated set of experienced smells [5,6]. Both olfaction and gustation start to decline in humans around the age of 50-59 years, with 40% of the elderly experiencing a noticeable decline [7]. A person’s first awareness of decline in olfaction as our primary dependence for identification of flavour occurs when one is unable to distinguish foods by taste alone. Olfaction also performs an important and essential role in our ability to detect dangers, including the smell of leaking gas, the burning odour of fire, and the putrid smell of rotten food. Olfaction is also responsible for enrichment and psychological stimulation in our everyday lives, such as with the scents and smells of foods and flowers [8]. In an already aged society, healthy olfaction is a necessary part of creating a safe and fertile living environment and for improving an individual’s quality of life. Considering these circumstances, this study aims to understand the age-related decline in olfactory and taste function in participants aged 40-49 years; 50-59 years; 60-69 years; 70-79 years and 80-89 years. We identified the odours and taste particularly difficult to distinguish for individuals of these age and sex groups. This might help draw attention to issues faced by individuals in their daily lives and facilitate improvement in their quality of life.

Material and Methods

Participants

The participants were community dwellers who voluntarily participated in the Yakumo Study and had managed their everyday life themselves. The Yakumo Study has been conducted since 1981 as a joint project between the town of Yakumo in Hokkaido and the Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine. Professionals in the fields of epidemiology, internal medicine, orthopaedics, neuropsychology, ophthalmology, otolaryngology, and urology have joined to the Yakumo Study. The analysed data here were based upon the database from 2015 from the neuropsychology and otolaryngology teams. The participants had been engaged in a variety of jobs, not only white collar but also in agriculture, fishery, and forestry. Therefore, this town can be regarded as representative of today's Japanese society. From the database, 1210 participants (660women and 550 men) were selected form data in August, 2015-2017.

Assessment of Salt Taste Identification

The gustatory test was performed using test paper SALSAVE (ADVANTEC Co. Ltd.), which include 7 different densities of NaCl on a test paper, as follows: 0.0 mg/cm2, 0.6 mg/cm2, 0.8 mg/cm2, 1.0 mg/cm2, 1.2 mg/cm2, 1.4 mg/cm2, and 1.6 mg/cm2. The participant placed a test paper on the tongue and closed the mouth to feel the taste. We inspect it from the light taste. When the participant understood that there is taste is detection. When participant might be said that it is saltiness is the recognition. Firstly, the participant rides 0.0% of test papers on the tongue and checks taste. The participant learns the taste of the test paper. Participant checks taste on a tongue from a test paper having a low density of NaCl sequentially afterward. There is the report that detection of salt taste is more important than recognition to salt taste [9].

Assessment of Odour Identification

The Odour Stick Identification Test (OSIT-J) was used to assess odour perception. This test possesses high reliability and validity [10]. The OSIT-J includes 12 different odorants to be identified (Table 1).

Year

2015

2016

2018

Total

Male

142

214

194

550

Female

169

262

229

660

Total

311

476

423

1210

Table 1: Participant number of inhabitant’s examination in Yakumo-study 2016-2018 (n=1210).

 

As odour perception is not necessarily culture-free, the Japanese version was employed [11,12]. The basic procedure resembles that of the San Diego Odour Identification Test [13]. The aromas used in the OSIT-J includes curry, perfume, Japanese cypress, India ink, menthol, rose, wood, nattou/sweat socks, roasted garlic, condensed milk, gas for cooking, and Japanese mandarin aromas. Each fragrance was enclosed in microcapsules made of melamine resin. These microcapsules were mixed with an odourless solid cream and then shaped to look like a lipstick. During the inspection test, the examiner applied each odorant to a piece of paraffin paper. After application, the examiner handed the paper to the participant, who would then sniff the paper and identify the odour. Participants selected each answer from a set of cards, each of which listed the name of an odorant, including the correct answer. Each correct answer was scored as one point, with the total performance score ranging from 0 to 12 points.

Statistical Processing

All data were confirmed to be normal distribution by F test. Data that was normally distributed was compared with Student-t without correlation of parametric test. The data that was not normally distributed was compared with the uncorrelated Mann-Whitney test of the nonparametric test.

Ethical Review Board

This study was conducted with the approval of the Ethical Review Board (Nagoya women's university ‘hito wo mochiita kennkyuu ni kansuru iinnkai’). The approval number is 27-11.

Results

Participants Age distribution

We united data for 3 years and had a table according to sex and the age of the participant. The male was 550 participants in all, 40s were 45 participants, 50s were 87 participants, 60s were 261 participants, 70s were 125 participants, 80s were 32 participants (Table 2). The female was 660 participants in all, 40s were 81 participants, 50s were 146 participants, 60s were 268 participants, 70s were 136 participants, 80s were 29 participants (Table 3).

Male

40's

50's

60's

70's

80's

Total

2015

11

23

73

27

8

142

2016

20

35

102

43

14

214

2017

14

29

86

55

10

194

Total

45

87

261

125

32

550

Table 2: Age composition of participants in Yakumo-study.

(Total number of males in 3 years: 2016-2017) (n=550).

 

Female

40's

50's

60's

70's

80's

Total

2015

20

43

69

32

5

169

2016

37

54

103

53

15

262

2017

24

49

96

51

9

229

Total

81

146

268

136

29

660

Table 3: Age composition of participants in Yakumo-study.

(Total number of females in 3 years: 2016-2017) (n=660).

 

Assessment of Salt Taste Identification

We performed cognitive inspection of the saltiness. The participant who recognized 0.6% of saltiness in male 40s was 22.2%, in male 50s was 32.2%, in male 60s was 40.2%, in male 70s was 32.0%, and in male 80s was 40.6%. The recognition of 0.6% of saltiness was a very low value in all generations. However, about 60% of participants were able to recognize saltiness when they confirmed a result in saltiness within 1% (0.6%, 0.8%, 1.0%). In addition, there were 51 participants who could not recognize less than 1.6% of saltiness. The most of participants who could not recognize less than 1.6% of saltiness were in 60s and in 70s (Table 4).

Salt concentration

40's (n=45)

50's (n=87)

60's (n=261)

70's (n=125)

80's (n=32)

0.60%

10

28

105

40

13

0.80%

12

21

44

29

7

1.00%

12

17

33

19

1

1.20%

3

10

14

10

4

1.40%

3

5

17

3

3

1.60%

2

0

15

3

1

More than 1.6%

2

5

30

19

2

Taste less

1

1

2

0

0

Not examination

0

0

1

2

1

Percentage of recognition in less than 1%

75.60%

75.90%

69.70%

70.40%

65.60%

Percentage of recognition with 0.6%

22.20%

32.20%

40.20%

32.00%

40.60%

 Table 4: Result of Salt taste-test (Male = 550): Number of participants perceived at each concentration of salt by age.

 

The participant who recognized 0.6% of saltiness in female 40s was 39.5%, in male 50s was 41.1%, in male 60s was 41.8%, in male 70s was 40.4%, and in male 80s was 37.9%. The recognition of 0.6% of saltiness was a very low value in all generations. However, about 70.0% of participants were able to recognize saltiness when they confirmed a result in saltiness within 1% (0.6%, 0.8%, 1.0%). In addition, there were 60 participants who could not recognize less than 1.6% of saltiness. The most of participants who could not recognize less than 1.6% of saltiness were in 60s and in 70s. Female results of salt concentration cognitive test was better than male results (Table 5).

Salt concentration

40's (n=81)

50's (n=146)

60's (n=268)

70's (n=136)

80's (n=29)

0.60%

32

60

112

55

11

0.80%

17

31

55

34

7

1.00%

9

14

37

14

3

1.20%

4

11

16

9

0

1.40%

5

15

17

4

2

1.60%

2

3

10

4

0

More than 1.6%

11

11

19

13

6

Taste less

0

0

1

0

0

Not examination

1

1

1

3

0

Percentage of recognition in less than 1%

71.60%

71.90%

76.10%

75.70%

72.40%

Percentage of recognition with 0.6%

39.50%

41.10%

41.80%

40.40%

37.90%

 Table 5: Result of Salt taste-test (Female = 660): Number of participants perceived at each concentration of salt by age.

 

Assessment of Odour Identification

12 kinds of olfactometry results in the man were as follows table 6.

Olfactometry recognition number

40's (n=45)

50's (n=87)

60's (n=261)

70's (n=125)

80's (n=32)

0

0

1

12

7

2

1

1

5

14

8

5

2

0

0

7

10

0

3

1

1

18

8

0

4

0

2

17

12

7

5

2

3

23

16 (A)

3 (M&A)

6

2

6

19 (A)

12 (M)

3

7

1

8

26 (M)

15

6

8

9 (A)

10 (A)

46

10

2

9

13 (M)

15 (M)

33

11

4

10

4

14

19

10

0

11

8

11

20

5

0

12

4

11

7

1

0

Percentage of recognition more than six kinds

91.10%

86.20%

65.10%

51.20%

46.80%

Percentage of recognition more than eight kinds

84.40%

70.10%

47.90%

22.40%

18.80%

Table 6: Result of Olfactometry recognition-test (Male = 550): Number of participants perceived at 12 kinds of smell by age.

(A) = Average value for that age; (M) = Median value for that age.

 

Male participant who was able to recognize smells more than eight kinds among 12 kinds of smells was 84.4% in 40s, 70.1% in 50s, 47.9% in 60s, 22.4% in 70s, and 18.8% in 80s. But, male participant who was able to recognize smells more than six kinds among 12 kinds of smells was 91.1% in 40s, 86.2% in 50s, 65.1% in 60s, 51.2% in 70s, and 46.8% in 80s. The median at 12 kinds of smells in 40s male was 9 kinds, in 50s male was 9 kinds, in 60s male was 7 kinds, in 70s male was 5 kinds, and in 80s male was 4 kinds. The average at 12 kinds of smells in 40s male was 8 kinds, in 50s male was 8 kinds, in 60s male was 6 kinds, in 70s male was 5 kinds, and in 80s male was 5 kinds. It was revealed that the olfactory recognition fell with age. The olfactory recognition suddenly decreased in 60 years old or more in particular. 12 kinds of olfactometry results in the foeman were as follows table 7.

Olfactometry recognition number

40's (n=81)

50's (n=146)

60's (n=268)

70's (n=136)

80's (n=29)

0

3

2

3

6

5

1

2

3

10

3

0

2

2

3

7

4

5

3

0

1

4

11

2

4

0

3

8

10

4 (A & M)

5

2

3

12

11

5

6

1

5

16

11 (M)

2

7

4

5

23

21 (M)

0

8

4

24

39 (A)

19

2

9

16 (A)

20 (A)

41 (M)

11

3

10

22 (M)

31 (M)

42

10

1

11

16

27

37

5

0

12

9

19

26

6

0

Percentage of recognition more than six kinds

88.90%

89.70%

83.60%

66.90%

27.60%

Percentage of recognition more than eight kinds

82.70%

82.90%

82.90%

43.40%

20.70%

 Table 7: Result of Olfactometry recognition-test (Female = 660): Number of participants perceived at 12 kinds of smell by age.

(A) = Average value for that age; (M) = Median value for that age.

 

Male participant who was able to recognize smells more than eight kinds among 12 kinds of smells was 82.7% in 40s, 82.9% in 50s, 69.0% in 60s, 43.4% in 70s, and 207% in 80s. But, male participant who was able to recognize smells more than six kinds among 12 kinds of smells was 88.9% in 40s, 89.7% in 50s, 83.6% in 60s, 66.9% in 70s, and 27.6% in 80s. The median at 12 kinds of smells in 40s male was 10 kinds, in 50s male was 10 kinds, in 60s male was 9 kinds, in 70s male was 7 kinds, and in 80s male was 4 kinds. The average at 12 kinds of smells in 40s male was 9 kinds, in 50s male was 9 kinds, in 60s male was 8 kinds, in 70s male was 6 kinds, and in 80s male was 4 kinds. It was revealed that the olfactory recognition fell with age. The olfactory recognition suddenly decreased in 80 years old in particular.

Odour Identification Ratio of 12 Different Smells

We checked 12 kinds of odour recognition individually. We show the result of the male in table 8, and the result of the female in table 9.

Correct answer rate %

Smell Name

Rank

74.9

Curry

1

67

Sweat socks

2

61.4

Fried garlic

3

58.7

Perfume

5

57.2

Condensed milk

4

55.9

India inc

6

55.6

Home gas

7

55.2

Rose

8

51.2

Wood

9

49.5

Menthol

10

47.4

Mandarin orange

11

42.1

Cypress

12

 Table 8: Evaluated in descending order of correct answer rate in odor recognition test (Male=550).

 

Correct answer rate %

Smell Name

Rank

83

Curry

1

74.1

Sweat socks

2

71.8

Fried garlic

3

70.8

Perfume

5

67.7

Condensed milk

4

67.3

India inc

6

65.1

Home gas

7

64.8

Rose

8

63

Wood

9

61.8

Menthol

10

59.2

Mandarin orange

11

55.3

Cypress

12

Table 9: Evaluated in descending order of correct answer rate in odor recognition test (Female=660). 

 

Female result was higher recognition for each smell than male result. Result of 12 kinds of odour recognition, male and female have the same result of top three incenses and bottom four incenses. The most comprehensible smell was the following order. That incense is Curry, Sweat socks, and Fried garlic. The most incomprehensible smell was the following order. That incense is Cypress, Mandarin orange, Menthol, and Wood. Five kinds of other smells were different in some turns that they were able to recognize. The male recognized it in order of Perfume, Condensed milk, India inc, Home gas, and Rose. The female recognized it in order of Rose, India inc, Perfume, Home gas, and Condensed milk. As for the olfactory recognition of the male, it became clear in comparison with a female as approximately 10% low in many cases.

Statistical Results

Statistical treatment was carried out for male salt taste test results by age by using F test. When there was no statistically significant difference in this result, statistical processing was performed again using the Student-t test with no correlation. And when there was a statistically significant difference in this result, statistical processing was performed again using Mann-Whitney test without correlation (Table 10). Likewise, statistical treatment was performed on the female salt taste test results (Table 11). Statistical treatment was also conducted on the salt taste test results of males and females of the same age (Table 12). Regarding the salt taste, it was revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between males and females. It was also found that there was no statistically significant difference between age with regard to taste.

 

40's × 50's

40's × 60's

40's × 70's

40's × 80's

50's × 60's

F test

0.202

0.109

0.367

0.221

0.003**

Student-t test without correlation

0.225

0.248

0.144

0.249

 

Mann-Whitney test without correlation

 

 

 

 

0.783

 

50's × 70's

50's × 80's

60's × 70's

60's × 80's

70's × 80's

F test

0.252

0.069

0.021*

0.524

0.139

Student-t test without correlation

0.751

0.961

 

0.958

 

Mann-Whitney test without correlation

 

 

0.261

 

 

Table10: Comparison of salt taste test results by age group of Male.

(Statistical analysis of F test, Student-t test without correlation and Mann-Whiten y test without correlation).

 

 

40's × 50's

40's × 60's

40's × 70's

40's × 80's

50's × 60's

F test

0.278

0.343

0.267

0.211

0.372

Student-t test without correlation

0.546

0.689

0.715

0.535

0.741

Mann-Whitney test without correlation

 

 

 

 

 

 

50's × 70's

50's × 80's

60's × 70's

60's × 80's

70's × 80's

F test

0.084

0.121

0.109

0.145

0.325

Student-t test without correlation

0.248

0.309

0.33

0.368

0.663

Mann-Whitney test without correlation

 

 

 

 

 

     Table 11: Comparison of salt taste test results by age group of Female.

(Statistical analysis of F test, Student-t test without correlation and Mann-Whitne y test without correlation).

 

 

Male 40's × Female 40's

Male 50's × Fe male 50's

Male 60's × Fe male 60's

F test

0.471

0.039*

0.091

Student-t test without correlation

0.081

 

0.474

Mann-Whitne y test without correlation

 

0.515

 

 

Male 70's × Female 70's

Male 80's × Fe male 80's

 

F test

0.451

0.081

 

Student-t test without correlation

0.694

0.324

 

Mann-Whitne y test without correlation

 

 

 

 Table 12: Comparison of salt taste test results by age and sex group.

(Statistical analysis of F test, Student-t test without correlation and Mann-Whitne y test without correlation).

 

Statistical treatment was carried out for male olfactory test results by age by using F test. When there was no statistically significant difference in this result, statistical processing was performed again using the Student-t test with no correlation. And when there was a statistically significant difference in this result, statistical processing was performed again using Mann-Whitney test without correlation (Table 13). Likewise, statistical treatment was performed on the female olfactory test results (Table 14). Statistical treatment was also conducted on the olfactory test results of males and females of the same age (Table 15). As for olfaction, it became clear that there is statistically significant difference between males and females. Female had statistically significant olfactory test results better than males. Statistically significant olfactory test results were particularly good in the sixties and seventies. It was also clear that there was statistically significant difference between age with respect to olfaction. The olfaction was diminished with age.

 

40's × 50's

40's × 60's

40's × 70's

40's × 80's

50's × 60's

F test

0.024*

0.002**

0.006**

0.174

0.266

Student-t test without correlation

 

 

 

0.0001**

0.0001**

Mann-Whitne y test without correlation

0.008**

0.0001**

0.0001**

 

 

 

50's × 70's

50's × 80's

60's × 70's

60's × 80's

70's × 80's

F test

0.322

0.299

0.47

0.179

0.201

Student-t test without correlation

0.0001**

0.0001**

0.0001**

0.010*

0.403

Mann-Whitne y test without correlation

 

 

 

 

 

Table 13: Comparison of olfactory test results by age group of Male.

(Statistical analysis of F test, Student-t test without correlation and Mann-Whitney test without correlation). 

 

 

40's × 50's

40's × 60's

40's × 70's

40's × 80's

50's × 60's

F test

0.13

0.272

0.306

0.363

0.013*

Student-t test without correlation

0.954

0.014*

0.0001**

0.0001**

 

Mann-Whitne y test without correlation

 

 

 

 

0.004**

 

50's × 70's

50's × 80's

60's × 70's

60's × 80's

70's × 80's

F test

0.033*

0.144

0.493

0.497

0.487

Student-t test without correlation

 

0.0001**

0.0001**

0.0001**

0.0001**

Mann-Whitne y test without correlation

0.0001**

 

 

 

 

Table 14: Comparison of olfactory test results by age group of Female.

(Statistical analysis of F test, Student-t test without correlation and Mann-Whitney test without correlation). 

 

 

Male 40's × Female 40's

Male 50's × Female 50's

Male 60's × Female 60's

F test

0.083

0.045*

0.176

Student-t test without correlation

0.568

 

0.0001**

Mann-Whitne y test without correlation

 

0.079

 

 

Male 70's × Female 70's

Male 80's × Female 80's

 

F test

0.275

0.307

 

Student-t test without correlation

0.004**

0.281

 

Mann-Whitne y test without correlation

 

 

 

Table 15: Comparison of olfactory test results by age and sex group.

(Statistical analysis of F test, Student-t test without correlation and Mann-Whitney test without correlation). 

 

Discussion

As expected, the correct identification rate measured using the odour identification test decreased with an increase in age, showing that olfaction declines with an increase in age. This result was similar to that obtained by Ayabe et al. [14] and shows the validity of the test method used in this study. Our level of sensory recognition of odours is created by the circumstances of our everyday lives [15]. This data provided this time were about the same with our last data which was accepted [16,17]. It was that there were very few participants who could recognize saltiness in 0.6% that was the most interesting in this study. Some researcher judges we have a decline in taste if we do not feel saltiness in 0.6%. However, it became clear necessary that we changed the standard from this result by the generation. If a participant can recognize saltiness in with 1.0%, 0.8%, and 0.6%, we should think that it is normal. In this study, among 12 kinds of smells, most people were not able to recognize four kinds of smells. Therefore, we think that it is enough if we will give a test having smelly eight kinds, need not 12 kinds of smell inspection in future. To prevent food poisoning; such as Sweat socks is necessary to identify. It is necessary to identify the home gas to prevent a gas explosion. We think that you should inspect it for these smells by all means. However, the smell of the rose and the smell of the perfume are similar very much. So, it is enough if we check only rose or perfume, we think. The opportunities when the modern society smells a cypress or the wood decrease. We think that it is good to do the olfactory test with four kinds of curry, steamed socks, fried garlic, and home gas. Or olfactory test may be three kinds of curry, Sweat socks and fried garlic. It is necessary to reduce the number of smells to be inspected in order to discover participants with olfactory decay by doing olfactive examination in a short time at the inhabitant medical examination. In late years it may be necessary to change contents of the olfactometry in future because Japanese lifestyle and living environment greatly change. We collect more data and we want to decide the cut-off level of taste examination and cut-off level of odour examination in future.

Conclusion

We performed an examination of taste and olfactometry in Yakumo-cho inhabitants’ medical examination. Odour results of female had better recognition than male. Taste results was not different between male and female. As for the male, odour recognition decreases from 60 years old in particular. As for the smell of three high ranks, man and woman was the same when we checked 12 kinds of smells individually. The most comprehensible smell was the following order. That incense is Curry, Sweat socks, and Fried garlic. The most incomprehensible smell was the following order. That incense is Cypress, Mandarin orange, Menthol, and Wood. We think that it is necessary to examine the top three kinds of smell without incomprehensible eight kinds of smell in the olfactometry in future. Because it is necessary to inspect many participants in short time in the inhabitant’s examination. It will be necessary to gather more data to decide the cut-off level in each generation of the olfactometry and taste examination in future. Because it is necessary to inspect many participants in a short time that in the inhabitant medical examination. We collect more data and we want to decide the cut-off level of taste examination and cut-off level of odour examination for each generation.

Acknowledgement

This study was conducted by a research aid of Choju-iryo-kenkyu-kaihatsuhi 28-3.

 

References

  1. Quint C, Temmel FA, Schickinger B, Pabinger S, Ramberger P, et al. (2001) Patterns of non-conductive olfactory disorders in eastern Austria; A study of 120 patients from the Department of Otorhinolaryngology at the University of Vienna. Wien Klin Wochenschr 113: 52-57.
  2. Welge-Lussen A, Wolfensberger M (2007) Olfactory disorders following upper respiratory tract infections; Taste and smell; Au update. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 63: 125-132.
  3. Kallmann JF, Schonfeld AW, Barrera ES (1944) The genetic aspects of primary eunuchoidism. Am J Ment Defic 48: 203-236.
  4. Mori K, Takahashi YK, Igarashi KM, Yamaguchi M (2006) Maps of odourant molecular featuresin the mammalian olfactory bulb. Physiol Pev 86: 409-433.
  5. Serizawa S, Ishii T, Nakatani H, Tsuboi A, Nagawa F, et al. (2000) Mutually exclusive expression of an odorant receptor gene in YAC transgenic mice. Nature Neurosci 3: 687-693.
  6. Serizawa S, Miyamichi K, Sakano H (2004) One neuron-one receptor rule in the mouse olfactory system. Trends in Gene 20: 648-653.
  7. Doty RL, Shaman P, Applebaum SL, Giberson R, Siksorski L, et al. (1983) Smell identification ability ; Changes with age. Science 226: 1441-1443.
  8. Saito S, Ayabe-Kanamura S, Takashima Y, Gotow N, Naito N, et al. (2006) Development of a smell identification test using a novel stick-type odor presentation kit. Chem Senses 31: 370-391.
  9. Nishimoto K, Ohhori J, Shimomugi T, Kurono Y (2005) Reproducibility of taste examination with Salsave: Control study for healthy volunteers. Japan Society of Stomato-pharyngology: 309-315.
  10. Kobayashi M (2005) The odor Stick Identification Test for the Japanese (OSIT-J): Clinical  suitability for patients suffering from olfactory disturbance. Chem Senses 30: i216-i217.
  11. Kobayashi M, Reiter ER, DiNardo LJ, Costanzo RM (2007) A new clinical olfactory function test: cultural influence. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133: 331-336.
  12. Kobayashi M, Saito S, Kobayakawa T, Deguchi Y, Costanzo RM (2006) Cross-culturalcomparison of data using the Odor Stick Identification Test for Japanese (OSIT-J). Chem Senses 31: 335-342.
  13. Murphy A, Anderson AJ, Markinson S (1994) Psychophysical assessment of chemosensorydisorders in clinical populations. Olfaction and Taste 609-613.
  14. Saito S, Ayabe-Kanamura S, Takashima Y, Gotow N, Naito N, et al. (2005) Development of a smell identification test using a novel stick-type odor presentation kit:The generation and a sex factor. Chem Senses 31: 52-55.
  15. Yatagai M, Ohira M, Ohira T, Nagai S (1995) Seasonal veriiations of terpene emission from trees and influence of temperature, light and contact stimulation on terpene emission. Chemosphere 30: 1137-1149.
  16. Katayama N, S. Kondo, H. Ootake, et al. Odour and Salt Taste Identification in Older Adults: Evidence from the Yakumo Study. Advances in Sciences and Engineering, 2017: 9: 20-31.
  17. Katayama N, Kondo S, Sugimoto S, Kinoshita W, Teranishi M, et al. (2018) Odour and Salt Taste Identification in Older Adults: Evidence from the Yakumo Study in August, 2016. Recent Adv Food Sci Nutr Res 1: 28-37.